Josh Hawley Says Women Are ‘People Who Give Birth’ And Then Get Confused About Vaginas

A question about defining “woman” — a question that baffled Republicans during Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s hearings last month and also labeled “fundamental” by Senator Marsha Blackburn to answer — is proving to be a stumbling block for GOP legislators to give a concise answer.

One in particular, Senator Josh Hawley, who spent his time during the hearings grilling Judge Jackson about her track record on punishing sex offenders, not only seemed unable to give a clear answer to the question. that he and fellow Republicans from the judiciary just weeks before the commission panicked, but were genuinely confused about how the human anatomy works.

In a series of hallway interviews, HuffPost Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the same question their House and Senate colleagues have derided as simple and straightforward: how to define a woman.

Their answers ranged from the textbook Republican (Sen Thom Tillis answered the question by saying “my wife”) to the more genetic (Sen Chuck Grassley echoed the definition Sen Blackburn initially gave: “A woman is born with two X chromosomes.” ). But Sen Hawley’s comments were perhaps the most questioning, and have led to the internet erupting into a widespread panning of what appeared to be his grave misconception of human anatomy.

When asked by the reporter’s question, Mr. Hawley began to boldly explain that femininity is inherently linked to a person’s ability to give birth, saying, “One who can bear a child, a mother, is a woman,” said Mr Hawley, before adding “one with a uterus is a woman. That doesn’t seem that complicated to me.”

The reporter then poked a hole in his logic by asking if a woman had her uterus removed, a procedure the CDC estimates 20 million people have done in the country would disqualify them from being included in the definition of mr hawley?

Mr Hawley answered the question by asking another question: “Yes. Well, I don’t know, do I?” When the reporter insisted on whether a woman would still be defined as such if, for example, she lost her reproductive organs to cancer, he replied again with a question, “I mean, a woman has a vagina, right? †

Reactions online to the Missouri Republican politician’s stumble have been swift and relentless, with many taking the time to point out the irony of the lawmaker struggling to answer the question he and his colleagues had derided for weeks as straightforward.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.